Saturated confusion of RealClimate.ORG
Originally posted on 6/27, moved to the top for the discussion to continueThe Gentlemen at RealClimate.ORG have decided that my article about
Who is the expert? Well, it is a noted historian of science whose name is
Weart writes in such a way that the text is well-readable and looks insightful to superficial readers. If you read it carefully, however, you can see that Weart has no idea what he is talking about at the technical level. First of all, the text is completely non-quantitative. All assertions are binary and dogmatic, Yes/No, and no quantitative laws or functional dependences are ever given, not even sketched. His text makes it impossible to decide whether one effect or another effect is important or not, or whether it has already been included or not.